USPTO serial 76229536
FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motor vehicles, namely, automobiles, trucks, vans, cars, sport utility vehicles, air craft, personal water craft, namely, boats, land craft, namely, cars, airplanes, seaplanes, gyro copters, namely, gyro planes, helicopters, amphibious airplanes, military air craft, gliders, hydroplanes, personal jet boats, water scooter, recreational jet boats, space craft, namely, lunar rovers, experimental vehicles, namely, cars, recreational vehicles, namely, campers, boats, trains, speed boats, locomotives, buses, ships, yachts, cruise ships, sail boats, hover craft, helicopters, recreational vehicles, namely, campers, motorized scooters, all terrain vehicles, marine vehicle, namely, boats, ferry boats, lunar rover and shuttles, tractors, locomotive, spacecraft, namely, rockets, all terrain vehicles, motorcycles, bicycles, and structural parts therefore | ACTIVE | Apr 17, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |