USPTO serial 76229597
MAGCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3105432Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2006
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - SLIE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAGCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1366 Lysaker, NO
1366 LYSAKER, NO
1366 LYSAKER, NO
1366 LYSAKER, NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori N. Boatright
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic encoded chip cards and magnetic cards that permit users to purchase goods and services and to verify their identity by waving and scanning the cards proximate to point of sale terminals associated with financial accounts and databases of identity information; computer hardware and software for operating such point of sale terminals and electronic encoded chip cards and magnetic cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, electronic mail services, communication by computer terminals, telephone communication services, telephone communication via computer networks; messaging services, namely, delivery of messages by electronic transmission, telegraph and computer networks; mobile telephone services; electronic transmission of messages and pictures by computers, paging services by radio, telephone or other types of electronic communication; radio communication, facsimile services, telephone services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data and graphics by means of telephone transmission, information about telecommunication; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; leasing and renting of telephones, leasing and renting of telecommunication equipment will all services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | design of computer software for mobile telephones for others; licensing of patents; technical consultation in the field of mobile telephone services; rental of computers and computer software with all services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAGCOM AS
- Other trademarks owned by Q-FREE MAGCOM AS
- Other trademarks owned by Q-FREE MAGCOM AS
- Other trademarks owned by Q-FREE MAGCOM AS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAGCOM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |