USPTO serial 76229653
NARTHEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 2003
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NARTHEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne E. Naffziger
Anne E. Naffziger LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. StetsonSUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6780Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING A WEB SITE FEATURING BUSINESS INFORMATION, NAMELY, MANAGEMENT AND COMPANY INFORMATION AND BUSINESS FORMS, SEARCHABLE DATABASES OF STORED CONTACTS IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS, MEMBER BUSINESS DEALS, BUSINESS TIPS, BUSINESS DISCUSSION GROUPS, BUSINESS INFORMATION FROM COMMERCIAL TRADE PRESS AND NEWSWIRE SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
| 036 | PROVIDING A WEB SITE FEATURING FINANCIAL INFORMATION, NAMELY, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPANY INFORMATION AND FINANCIAL FORMS, MEMBER FINANCIAL DEALS AND BEST FINANCIAL PRACTICE TIPS, FINANCIAL DISCUSSION GROUPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Village Ventures, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Village Ventures, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Village Ventures, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named NARTHEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |