USPTO serial 76229696
VU COMMAND LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4270145Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2013
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VU COMMAND LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment
Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment
Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
GEORGE W. LEWIS Westerman Hattori Daniels & Adrian, LLP1250 Connecticut Ave., NWSuite 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS; VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS; ELECTRIC TOY TRAIN TRANSFORMERS; ELECTRONIC DART GAMES; ELECTRONIC EDUCATIONAL GAME MACHINES FOR CHILDREN; ELECTRONIC GAME EQUIPMENT WITH A WATCH FUNCTION; HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAME; TEACHING MATERIALS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC LIQUID CRYSTAL GAMES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named VU COMMAND LINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |