Drawing for UDS CLEAN FUELS. CONVENIENCE.

USPTO serial 76229769

UDS CLEAN FUELS. CONVENIENCE.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UDS CLEAN FUELS. CONVENIENCE.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

JILL M PIETRINI MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP11355 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Motor fuels, namely, gasoline, jet fuels, and diesel fuel; heating fuel; fuel oil for vessels; all-purpose lubricants; petroleum, namely, liquid petroleum gas, crude petroleum, and petroleum for use as a heating oil; natural gas; crude oil; and automotive transmission fluidACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance