USPTO serial 76229777
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRIET E PERKINS
HARRIET E PERKINS DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP18TH & CHERRY STSONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Anti-freeze and summer coolant; aromatic solvents, brake fluid; paraffin solvents; automobile cooling system rust inhibitors; chemical fuel and oil additives for motor vehicles | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1970 |
| 003 | combined auto wax and cleaner composition; steam cleaning solution for automotive engine blocks, wheels, and chassis, electrical motors, mill aid mining machinery, and removal of rust-preventative coatings, carburetor cleaner, aluminum cleaning solutions, degreasing solvents for use on vehicles and windshield cleaner fluids | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1970 |
| 004 | Kerosene; fuel oil; lubricating oils; lubricating greases for use with vehicles; diesel fuel; jet fuel; gasoline; water pump lubricants; automatic transmission fluid; valve lube fluid; household fuel oil; industrial lubricating oil; cutting oil for industrial metal working; pressurized propane, lighter fluid | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1970 |
| 037 | automotive service station services | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1970 |
| 039 | transportation services for refinery products by rail, truck and water and terminal storage services for refinery products | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1970 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2007 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |