USPTO serial 76229799
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRIET E PERKINS
HARRIET E PERKINS DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP18TH & CHERRY STSONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Anti-freeze and summer coolant; chemicals used in the automotive and gasoline industries, namely, aromatics; brake fluid; paraffin solvents; automobile cooling system rust inhibitors; chemical fuel and oil additives for motor vehicles | ABANDONED | Sep 10, 1969 |
| 004 | Propane gas, lighter fluid, kerosene, fuel oil, lubricating oils, lubricating greases for use with vehicles, diesel fuel, jet fuel, gasoline, water pump lubricant, automatic transmission fluid, valve lube fluid, household fuel oil, industrial lubricating oil, cutting oil for industrial metal working, and transformer oil | ABANDONED | Sep 10, 1969 |
| 037 | Automobile service station services | ABANDONED | Sep 10, 1969 |
| 039 | Transportation services for refinery products by rail, truck and water and terminal storage services for refinery products | ABANDONED | Sep 10, 1969 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2007 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |