USPTO serial 76230001
COLLOIDAL SILVER PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLLOIDAL SILVER PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. de Jonge
PETER M DE JONGETHORPE N & WESTERN LLPPO BOX 1219SANDY, UT 84091-1219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional and food supplements, namely, herb compositions, colloidal silver, and nonprescription medications for cold, flu, allergies, skeletal structure, joints, cardiovascular system, pulmonary system, mental processing, emotional state, immune response, skin and tissue treatment, metabolism, muscle development, and digestion/gastrointestinal management | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |