USPTO serial 76230065
BOODA DOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2004
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOODA DOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Denver, CO
Denver, CO
Denver, CO
ASPEN PET PRODUCTS HOLDINGS, INC.
DENVER, CO
Doskocil Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Arlington, TX
Other trademarks owned by Doskocil Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David V. Radack
David V. Radack Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC600 Grant Street, 44th FloorPittsburgh, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aspen Pet Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Aspen Pet Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Aspen Pet Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN PET PRODUCTS HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Doskocil Manufacturing Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named BOODA DOME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |