USPTO serial 76230085
MAX-T
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3051960Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 31, 2006
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAX-T?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
BURLINGTON, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel L. Scales
Avid Technology, Inc.75 Network DriveAttn: Trademark AdministratorBurlington, MA 01803Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers and computer peripheral equipment, namely, computer terminals, video display units, computer printers, computer servers, modems, computer operating software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Documentation, namely, instructional manuals and user guides related to computers and computer peripheral equipment, namely, to computer terminals, video display units, computer printers, computer servers, modems, and computer operating software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | development of computer software and hardware; research and development of technical-support solutions and of troubleshooting solutions relating to the storage of data and sever solutions, including the technical support of high bandwidth data storage solutions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maximum Throughput Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Maximum Throughput Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Maximum Throughput Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MAXT SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AVID TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAX-T
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |