USPTO serial 76230086
MAXIMUM THROUGHPUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2950424Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXIMUM THROUGHPUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
BURLINGTON, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel L. Scales
Avid Technology, Inc.75 Network DriveAttn: Trademark AdministratorBurlington, MA 01803Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers and computer peripheral equipment, namely, computer terminals, video display units, computer printers, computer servers, modems, disc drives, computer operating software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | documentation, namely, instructional manuals and user guides related to computers and computer peripheral equipment, namely, to computer terminals, video display units, computer printers, computer servers, modems, disc drives, and computer operating software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | The development of computer software and hardware; research and development of technical-support solutions and of troubleshooting solutions relating to the storage of data and server solutions, including the technical support of high bandwidth data storage solutions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maximum Throughput Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Maximum Throughput Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MAXT SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AVID TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAXIMUM THROUGHPUT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |