USPTO serial 76230196
LP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lucian Wayne Beavers
LUCIAN WAYNE BEAVERS WADDEY & PATTERSON, PC414 UNION ST STE 2020NASHVILLE, TN 37219-1767UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Stringed musical instruments - namely, electric guitars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |