Drawing for THINK IN INK

USPTO serial 76230311

THINK IN INK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINK IN INK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen D. Kahn

STEPHEN D KAHN WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP767 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016writing instrumentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 21, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 3, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 19, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 17, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance