USPTO serial 76230342
ICE CREAM IS THE HAPPIEST FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICE CREAM IS THE HAPPIEST FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasantville, NY
Pleasantville, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOEL L. HECKER
JOEL L HECKER RUSSO & BURKE600 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship and retail store services featuring ice cream, light ice cream, fat free ice cream, frozen yogurt, sherbert, flavored ices, ice milk and frozen dairy and confectionary deserts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |