USPTO serial 76230704
IONGLOBAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IONGLOBAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH J VILLAPOL
JOSEPH J VILLAPOL LADAS & PARRY26 W 61 STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management and business administration; business consultancy services; business strategy and solution services; management solutions and consultancy services relating thereto; advertising services, promotion services, marketing services and information services with the object of assisting in the working or management of a commercial undertaking and in the management of commercial functions of an industrial or commercial enterprise; promotional communication strategy surveys, investigations of marketing strategy, business consultancy services and business advice and analysis relating to marketing, strategic marketing and marketing management consultations; consultancy services relating to marketing; marketing management advice; planning of marketing strategies; business advice and analysis relating to business information systems and business management systems; customer relations management and personalization business and management strategies; the foregoing services also provided on-line from a computer data-base or by means of web pages on the Internet; compilation of advertisements for use as web pages | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing access to and leasing access time to computer databases; design drawing and commissioned writing all for the compilation of web pages on the Internet and computer generated work; design, development, maintenance and updating of web pages on the Internet for others; hosting web sites for others, evaluation of efficiency of computer systems against bench mark references; design of audio-visual creative works by means of digital techniques; expert advice, analysis and opinion relating to technology, in particular technology integration and computer system integration; professional consultancy services relating to technology exploitation; advisory services relating to computer systems, analysis and design; computer programming; computer software design, computer systems development; provision of information on-line regarding the aforementioned services from a computer database or provided from facilities on the Internet; news reporter services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |