USPTO serial 76230728
SAPOT SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAPOT SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aichi-ken 444-2192, JP
Aichi-ken 444-2192, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIRIAM D TRUDELL
MIRIAM D TRUDELL SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL FIBER CABLES; OPTICAL FILTERS; OPTICAL LENSES; OPTICAL MIRRORS; CONTACT LENSES; CONTAINERS FOR CONTACT LENSES; SPECTACLE CASES; LENSES FOR SPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES; SPECTACLE FRAMES; OPTICAL GLASSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | PROCESSING AND TREATMENT OF CONTACT LENSES, EYEGLASS LENSES, OPTICAL LENSES AND SPECTACLES; CUTTING, GRINDING AND POLISHING OF EYEGLASS LENSES; EYEGLASS LENS DYEING; EYEGLASS LENS GROOVING; OPTICAL LENS GRINDING; PROCESSING AND TREATMENT OF GLASSES; PROCESSING AND TREATMENT OF METALS; PROCESSING AND TREATMENT OF ELECTRIC MATERIALS; PROCESSING AND TREATMENT OF ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS; PROCESSING AND TREATMENT OF CHEMICAL PRODUCTS; CUSTOM ASSEMBLING AND PROCESSING OF COMPUTER PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT; THIN-FILM PROCESSING AND TREATMENT; SURFACE COATING PROCESSING AND TREATMENT, FILM COATING PROCESSING AND TREATMENT; RENTAL OF PROCESSING MACHINES FOR ADJUSTMENT OF SPECTACLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tokai Optical Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Tokai Optical Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named SAPOT SYSTEM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |