USPTO serial 76230777
SHARX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHARX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily A. Shouse
EMILY A SHOUSE WADDEY & PATTERSON414 UNION ST STE 2020BANK OF AMERICA PLZNASHVILLE, TN 37219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SWIM GEAR, NAMELY LIFE JACKETS, LIFE SAVINGS RAFTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, JACKETS, SOCKS, SWEAT SHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, SWIMSUITS, HATS AND PANTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | SWIM GOGGLES; SCUBA FLIPPERS; SNORKELS; SWIMMING AIDS; NAMELY POOL RINGS AND FLOATS FOR RECREATIONAL USE; SWIM TOYS, NAMELY WATER SQUIRTING TOYS AND WATER INFLATABLE TOYS; SWIM BOARDS FOR RECREATIONAL USE; GAMES, NAMELY, DIVING, RACING, AND SWIMMING; TOY ACTION FIGURES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |