USPTO serial 76230903
ELINKSUITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELINKSUITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1170 Bruxelles, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN ZACCARIA
JOHN ZACCARIA NOTARO & MICHALOS, PC100 DUTCH HILL RD STE 100ORANGEBURG, NY 10962UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS, GROUPWARE, SOFTWARE AND DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE, ALL USED FOR CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, ACCESSING COMPUTER NETWORKS, ACCESSING ON-LINE DATABASES, FOR DATA EXCHANGE OVER GLOBAL AND LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, COLLECTING AND PROCESSING DIGITAL INFORMATION, FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, FOR DATA-MINING APPLICATIONS, FOR DATABASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELDS OF FINANCE, BANKING, INSURANCE, INDUSTRY, MANUFACTURING, CONSULTING AND SERVICES FOR PRIVATE COMPANIES OR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; ELECTRONIC MAIL EXCHANGE AND FOR AUTOMATED VOICE MESSAGING OVER GLOBAL AND LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Data transfer over global computer networks; electronic mail services via global and local computer networks; automated voice telecommunication over global and local computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others; design and development of groupware, software and downloadable software, namely, for customer relationship management, for accessing computer networks, for accessing on-line databases, for data exchange over global and local computer networks, for collecting and processing digital information, for knowledge management, for data-mining applications, for database management, for electronic mail exchange and for automated voice messaging over global and local computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |