USPTO serial 76230913
NCHA SUMMER CUTTING SPECTACULAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NCHA SUMMER CUTTING SPECTACULAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. Mohtares
PAUL A MOHTARES GOINS UNDERKOFLER CRAWFORD & LANGDON1601 ELM ST STE 3300DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Drinking glasses, cups, mugs, tumblers, and insulated beverage coolers | ACTIVE | Jan 23, 1991 |
| 025 | Human apparel products, namely dress shirts, casual shirts, jeans, casual pants, vests, underwear, dress shorts, casual shorts, caps, shoes, boots, fleece pullovers, knit shirts, coats, jackets, topcoats, and rain coats | ACTIVE | Jan 23, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |