Drawing for PRISMSOFTWARE

USPTO serial 76230961

PRISMSOFTWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRISMSOFTWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynda J Zadra-Symes

LYNDA J ZADRA-SYMES KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY PRODUCTION SOFTWARE TO MANAGE AND TRANSLATE PRINT STREAMS IN CORPORATE PRINTING CENTERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 27, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 27, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 8, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 17, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 14, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 14, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 5, 2006UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
May 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 5, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 22, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance