USPTO serial 76231203
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. McClain
JOHN L HALLER GORDON & REES LLP101 W BROADWAY STE 1600SAN DIEGO CA, 92101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ZONE CABLING DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR DISTRIBUTION AND ROUTING OF NETWORK TELECOMMUNICATIONS DATA AND TELEPHONY, SAID DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ENABLES DISTRIBUTED NETWORK ARCHITECTURES AND IS COMPRISED OF HOUSINGS, CONDUCTORS, CABLE TERMINATIONS AND CONNECTIONS, ACTIVE NETWORK ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND CABLE MANAGEMENT COMPONENTS; SAID CONDUCTORS, NAMELY CABLING COMPRISED OF COPPER, COAXIAL, AND OPTICAL FIBER; SAID CABLE TERMINATIONS AND CONNECTIONS COMPRISED OF PATCH PANELS, CONNECTOR BLACKS, CONNECTORS, AND RETAINER CLIPS; SAID NETWORK ACTIVE ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS COMPRISED OF SWITCHES, HUBS, AND ROUTERS, THEREFOR; CONDUITS FOR SAID FIBER OPTIC, WIRE, LIGHT AND IMAGE CONDUCTORS AND CABLING; AND CONDUCTOR AND CABLING MANAGEMENT SPOOLS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |