USPTO serial 76231294
LE CHIC PARISIEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2003
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LE CHIC PARISIEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA
Fountain Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith W. Medansky, Mark I. Feldman, James P. Ryther, Monica L. Thompson, Christina L. Martini, Linda Urbanik Johnson, Thomas W. Ryan, Micah R. Onixt, Gina L. Durham, Jennifer J. Ruttenberg and Amy C. Ziegler
Keith W. Medansky, Mark I. Feldman, James P. Rythe DLA Piper US LLPP. O. Box 64807Chicago, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BAR SOAP AND FRAGRANCED BODY POWDER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 8, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GIANNA ROSE ATELIER, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GIANNA ROSE ATELIER, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by S.O.P. ACQUISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by S.O.P. ACQUISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Gianna Rose Atelier, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named LE CHIC PARISIEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |