USPTO serial 76231418
SKYLARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKYLARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M Graham Coleman 2d
M GRAHAM COLEMAN ESQ DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1633 BROADWAY 27TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | fragrances; namely, perfumes, colognes and eau de toilettes; body powders, body creams, skin and hair lotions, personal deodorants and antiperspirants, bath gels and bath soaps, lipsticks, powder blushes, facial powders, lip glosses, lip balms, after shave balms, after shave lotions, body mousses, skin cleansers, skin toners and moisturizers, and gift kits of the aforesaid goods for promotion of the products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |