USPTO serial 76231430
LITTLE MISS HENNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3071321Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2006
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LITTLE MISS HENNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Thornhill, Ontario L4J 3J8, CA
Thornhill, Ontario L4J 3J8, CA
Thornhill, Ontario L4J 3J8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRETT A SCHATZ
BRETT A SCHATZ WOOD HERON & EVANS LLP441 VINE ST STE 2700CAREW TWRCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2917Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Little Miss Henna Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Little Miss Henna Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Little Miss Henna Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LITTLE MISS HENNA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |