USPTO serial 76231555
X-RACING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X-RACING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Valcourt, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Menker
James R. Menker Holley & Menker, P.A.PO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Recreational vehicles, namely, snowmobiles, personal watercraft, all-terrain vehicles and structural parts therefor; license plate holders, floor mats, vehicle covers. | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, wearing apparel and accessories, namely, shirts, sweatshirts, t-shirts, jerseys, sweaters, pullovers, pants, sweatpants, shorts, jackets, coats, wind-resistant jackets, vests, raincoats, gloves; footwear, namely, boots, socks; headgear namely, hats, caps, protective helmets; snow-sportswear, namely, highpants, pants, jackets, gloves, mitts, hats, balaclavas, bandannas, boots, racing suits. | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games, toys and playthings, namely, die-cast toys and vehicle replicas, radio-controlled toy vehicles, radio-controlled model vehicles, inflatable inner tubes for aquatic recreational use, floating recreational chairs, inflatable pool furniture and inflatable pool toys. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |