USPTO serial 76231556
X-SHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with X-SHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Valcourt, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Kruse
PAUL W KRUSE PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPP O BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, NAMELY, SNOWMOBILES, PERSONAL WATERCRAFT, ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES, MOTORIZED CARTS, LIGHT AIRCRAFT AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR; ENGINES FOR LAND VEHICLES; VEHICLE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, PICKUP TRUCK CAPS AND LINERS, BUG DEFLECTORS, ROCK DEFLECTORS, MUD FLAPS, BUMPER GUARDS, VEHICLE ROLL BARS, ROOF RACKS, TAIL GATE PROTECTORS, SALT SHIELDS AS STRUCTURAL PARTS OF VEHICLES, FENDER TRIM, LICENSE PLATE HOLDERS, FLOOR MATS, VEHICLE STORAGE CONTAINERS AND CARGO CARRIERS, SKI RACKS, BICYCLE RACKS, HITCH COVERS, CARGO NETS AND TIE-DOWN CORDS, VEHICLE REAR-LIGHT COVERS, VEHICLE COVERS; HAND TRUCKS, DOLLIES; CHILDREN'S STROLLERS; TRAILERS, TRAILER BOXES; SNOWBLOWERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |