USPTO serial 76231575
SMF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL G. VOORHEES
MICHAEL G VOORHEES ZARLEY, MCKEE, THOMTE, VOORHEES & ET AL801 GRAND AVE STE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SEMICONDUCTORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |