USPTO serial 76231620
ROYCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2828260Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2004
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROYCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Applesauce, asparagus, baked beans, processed beans, processed beets, processed blueberries, peanut butter, nut butters, processed cabbage, canned pork and beans, maraschino cherries, processed cherries, chili with or without beans, processed corn, cranberry sauce, canned fruits, maraschino cherries, olive oil, oysters for human consumption, processed peaches, peanut butter, canned tomatoes, cut canned vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |