USPTO serial 76231678
MG DUO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MG DUO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Storage media for audio, visual and/or computer data; integrated circuits; computers; printers; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sounds or images, namely, video cameras, electronic still cameras, televisions, audio players/recorders, video players/recorders, video players/recorders combined with video cameras, headphones, earphones, microphones, loudspeakers, radios and telephones; video game players and controllers therefor; integrated circuit memory cards; pre-recorded video game discs; computer software for conversion, encoding for the purpose of preventing copying, recording, reproduction, transmission and management of audio, video and computer data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |