Drawing for VERIFI

USPTO serial 76231706

VERIFI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERIFI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amelia A. Buharin

EUNICE DE CARVALHO FAEGRE & BENSON LLP2200 WLS FARGO CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management services; advertising services, namely, creating and maintaining corporate and brand identity for others; business marketing consultation; merchandise packaging and labeling management for othersACTIVE
037Installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardwareACTIVE
038telecommunication services for global computer networks with attached data storage devices, video conferencing devices, and computer peripheral devices, namely, monitors, printers, and faxes; and electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminalsACTIVE
042computer network and software design for others; application hosting for others; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; and computer system integration services for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Mar 10, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Mar 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 18, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 18, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 18, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 8, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 8, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 12, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 10, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance