USPTO serial 76231989
GOLDEN COB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLDEN COB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Kelly
TIMOTHY J KELLY FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Food for birds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARS, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by Kal Kan Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kal Kan Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named GOLDEN COB
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |