USPTO serial 76231992
FLORIDA SUN FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLORIDA SUN FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Tallahassee, FL
Other trademarks owned by State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Tallahassee, FL
Other trademarks owned by State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Fresh Tomatoes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
- Other trademarks owned by State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named FLORIDA SUN FRESH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |