USPTO serial 76232274
EVOSOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVOSOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-90411 Nurnberg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERIDAN NEIMARK
DIANA MICHELLE SOBO BROWDY AND NEIMARK PLLC624 9TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | ORTHOPEDIC APPARATUS, NAMELY MEDICINE BALLS AND CUSHIONS THAT TRANSMIT DATA TO A SOFTWARE PROGRAM VIA A SENSOR; SENSORS THAT SEND DATA FROM A MEDICINE BALL OR CUSHION TO A SOFTWARE PROGRAM | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS COST PRICE ANALYSIS SERVICE; EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ORGANIZATION CONSULTANCY SERVICES; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANCY SERVICES; BUSINESS FILE MANAGEMENT SERVICES; PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS CONSULTANCY SERVICES; COMPUTER DATABASE INFORMATION COMPILATION SERVICES COMPUTER DATABASE INFORMATION SYSTEMATIZATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, NAMELY CONDUCTING TRAINING, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, AND COURSES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | LEGAL SERVICES; CONDUCTING TECHNICAL PROJECT STUDIES; COMPUTER RENTAL; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER CONSULTANCY SERVICES; PROVIDING COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR REHABILITATION PURPOSES; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY DATA RECOVERY SERVICES, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SYSTEM ANALYSIS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by evosoft Tele Care GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EVOSOFT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |