USPTO serial 76232368
DOGGY DINNERWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2004
- Examiner
- MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DOGGY DINNERWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
S. Norwalk, CT
S. Norwalk, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Kunstadt
Robert M. Kunstadt R. KUNSTADT, P.C.875 SIXTH AVENUESUITE 1800NEW YORK, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | PET FEEDING DISHES AND JARS; RACKS TO BE USED WITH THE FOREGOING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |