USPTO serial 76232603
SEVILLE LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEVILLE LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J ITRI
ROBERT J ITRI GALLAGHER & KENNEDY PA2575 E CAMELBACK RD STE 1100PHOENIX, AZ 85016-9225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATTER OF OTHERS VIA THE INTERNET AND PROVIDING ON-LINE BUSINESS DIRECTORY INFORMATION SERVICES DIRECTED TOWARD CONSUMERS WITHIN A SPECIFIC RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ALSO FEATURING HYPERLINKS TO OTHER WEB SITES | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2000 |
| 036 | PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING INFORMATION ON REAL ESTATE, REAL ESTATE LISTINGS AND PROVIDING INFORMATION RELATED TO HOMES FOR SALE IN A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2000 |
| 038 | INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER, NAMELY, PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2000 |
| 041 | PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF SCHOOLS, CULTURAL EVENTS, NAMELY, THEATRE AND MUSEUM EXHIBITS, AND RECREATIONAL INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF TENNIS, SWIMMING, HANDBALL, RACQUETBALL, WEIGHTLIFTING, EXERCISE, PHYSICAL FITNESS, BOWLING, BOCCE BALL, GOLF, WALKING TRAILS, BICYCLE TRAILS, ARTS AND CRAFTS, SHUFFLEBOARD, LAWN BOWLING, SWIMMING, BILLIARDS, TENNIS, CARD GAMES, DANCING, AEROBICS, AND HEALTH AND FITNESS CLUB SERVICES | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHP
- Other trademarks owned by Shea Homes, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Shea Homes, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SEVILLE LIFE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |