USPTO serial 76232889
RAY RAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAY RAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned T. Himmelrich
NED T HIMMELRICH GORDON FEINBLATT ROTHMAN ET AL233 E REDWOOD STBALTIMORE, MD 21202-3332UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, bandannas, headbands, hats, t-shirts, shirts, sweat shirts, pants, shorts, sweat pants, skirts, blouses, dresses, ties, scarves, coats, jackets, sweaters, vests, socks, suspenders, cummerbunds, shoes, sandals, wristbands, underwear, belts, and gloves | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Goldman, Frank
- Other trademarks owned by Goldman, Frank
- Other trademarks owned by Goldman, Howard
- Other trademarks owned by Goldman, Howard
- Other trademarks owned by Huddles, Kirk
- Other trademarks owned by Huddles, Kirk
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RAY RAG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |