USPTO serial 76233136
SEA PUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEA PUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RACAL SURVEY SERVICES (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
SG
Other trademarks owned by RACAL SURVEY SERVICES (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
Thales Geosolution (Singapore) PTE., LTD.
SGX, SG
Other trademarks owned by Thales Geosolution (Singapore) PTE., LTD.
Thales Geosolution (Singapore) PTE., LTD.
SGX, SG
Other trademarks owned by Thales Geosolution (Singapore) PTE., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Newton
SCOTT COONAN THALES NORTH AMERICA INCSTE 400675 N WASHINGTON STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Observation class remotely-operated submersible vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RACAL SURVEY SERVICES (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Thales Geosolution (Singapore) PTE., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Thales Geosolution (Singapore) PTE., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SEA PUP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |