USPTO serial 76233214
ART IN MOTION GALLERY COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3005301Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2005
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ART IN MOTION GALLERY COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ART IN MOTION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
ART IN MOTION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Coquitlam, CA
COMPTON, CA
Coquitlam, British Columbia V3K 6W5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shari Klevens
Shari Klevens McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP1900 K Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Art prints; art reproductions; original art work, namely, original art pictures and original art prints; limited edition art work, namely, limited edition art pictures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ART IN MOTION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by ART IN MOTION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by N.W. Art in Motion, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERCONTINENTAL ART, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by N.W. Art in Motion, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ART IN MOTION GALLERY COLLECTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |