USPTO serial 76233338
Serial No. 76233338
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76233338?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY C. HONEYCUTT
LAWRENCE J BASSUK MS 3999TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATEDPO BOX 655474DALLAS, TX 75265Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |