Drawing for MEDIAVISTA

USPTO serial 76233671

MEDIAVISTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIAVISTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising agencies; business management; business management consultation; business appraisals; administration of business payrolls for others; office administration, namely, billing and bookkeeping services; commercial information agencies; preparation of custom advertisements and custom promotional products for others; organizing exhibitions and trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; rental of advertising space; direct mail advertising; publication of publicity texts; copyright managementACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions; telegram transmission and communication; electronic transmission of messages and data; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminal; leasing access time to a computer data base in the field of telecommunications providing information about telecommunications servicesACTIVE—
042Design for others of data processing systems and telecommunications networks; computer software design for others; computer programming for others; providing facilities for exhibitions; updating of computer software for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 3, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 24, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance