USPTO serial 76233689
LEMONLAW.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEMONLAW.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Murray
WILLIAM H MURRAY DUANE MORRIS & HECKSCHER LLPONE LIBERTY PLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7396UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | legal services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |