USPTO serial 76233747
DIAMOND STOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2952112Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIAMOND STOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F. ELLIOT GOLDMAN
F. ELLIOT GOLDMAN LAW OFFICE OF F. ELLIOT GOLDMAN420 S. Brea Blvd.BREA, CA 92821UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 8, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Goldenwest Diamond Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Goldenwest Diamond Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Goldenwest Diamond Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named DIAMOND STOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 17, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 4, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 4, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |