USPTO serial 76233900
ENSPIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENSPIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce J Goldner
BRUCE J GOLDNER SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLPFOUR TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6522UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | MANUFACTURED HOMES, NAMELY, PREFABRICATED, MODULAR, AND MOBILE HOMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | DEALERSHIPS FEATURING MANUFACTURED HOMES; ADVERTISING AND PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE ADMINISTERING AND CONDUCTING OF AFFINITY PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, MANAGING MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITIES; INSURANCE SERVICES, NAMELY, RETAIL BROKERAGE OF THIRD PARTIES' INSURANCE POLICIES MARKETED TO RESIDENTS OF MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITIES OR TO PURCHASERS OR POTENTIAL PURCHASERS OF MANUFACTURED HOMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARC Holdings Limited Liability Company
- Other trademarks owned by ARC Holdings Limited Liability Company
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named ENSPIRE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |