USPTO serial 76233903
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Scarborough, Ontario M1B 3V1, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H Begler
JAY H BEGLER BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PC140 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Astringents for cosmetic purposes, non-medicated lip balm, bath oil, bath powder, non-medicated bath salts, blusher, body cream, body oil, body powder, cold cream, cologne, cosmetic compacts, cosmetic pencils, cosmetic applicators namely cotton sticks and cotton balls for applying cosmetics, eye cream, hand cream, night cream, skin-cleansing cream, skin cream, vanishing cream, perfume, eye makeup, eye makeup remover, eye shadow, face powder, facial scrubs, foundation makeup, bath gel, hair gel, shower gel, lip gloss, lipstick, hair spray, makeup, mascara, massage oil, skin moisturizer, nail polish, rouge, sachets, hair shampoo, toilet water, wrinkle removing skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Manicure and pedicure implements namely nail files, files for removal of dry skin used for pedicures, nail clippers, tweezers, cuticle scissors and cuticle sticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bristle bath brushes, cosmetic brushes, cosmetic sponges and bath sponges, loofa products namely, loofa sponges and loofa back brushes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |