USPTO serial 76234003
INFINITY2 NUTRITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFINITY2 NUTRITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Babener
JEFFREY A BABENER BABENER & ASSOCIATES121 SW MORRISON STE 1020BANK OF AMERICA FINANCIAL CTRPORTLAND, OR 97204-3140Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorships featuring nutritional supplements; providing marketing services for others in the field of nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Designing custom formula nutritional supplements for others; providing nutritional consulting for others; physical fitness consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |