USPTO serial 76234041
ANOTHER LEAP INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANOTHER LEAP INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory P. Goonan
GREGORY P GOONAN THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP APC600 W BROADWAY STE 400SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3352UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS ACCESSED BY TELEPHONE, CABLE, SATELLITE, WIRELESS, HANDHELD DEVICES AND THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services and communications exchange services, namely, local, long distance and international transmission of voice, data, text, facsimile, video, and graphics, by means of telephone, cable, satellite, wireless handheld devices, and the Internet; providing online directory information services also featuring hyperlinks to other websites; electronic mail and voice messaging services, namely, electronic store and forward messaging by telephone, cable, satellite, wireless handheld devices, and the Internet; computer aided transmission of messages and images; transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; paging services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Online information services, namely, an electronic information service accessed by telephone, cable, satellite, wireless, handheld and paging devices and the Internet, providing general information in the fields of news, traffic, technology, sciences, health, fitness, fashion, home and garden, current events, local events, the arts, entertainment, sports and travel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |