Drawing for TIC-TAC-DOUGH!

USPTO serial 76234086

TIC-TAC-DOUGH!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIC-TAC-DOUGH!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harvey B. Sindle

HARVEY B SINDLE300 E 71 STREET;; STE 12LNEW YORK, NY 10021-5245UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services in the field of creating and implementing state lottery on-line and other games for entertainment and sporting purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 10, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 3, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 17, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 17, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 19, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 17, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance