USPTO serial 76234256
GRACE FABLIAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRACE FABLIAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ueno, Taito-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ueno, Taito-ku, Tokyo, JP
TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
ROBERT W ADAMS NIXON & VANDERHYE PC11TH FL901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203-1808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | CLOCKS, WATCHES AND PARTS AND ACCESSORIES THEREOF, NAMELY, SPRINGS, WATCH CASES, CHAINS, GLASS, BANDS, HANDS, PENDULUM AND DIAL PLATES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA TAIYO SHOKAI
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA TAIYO SHOKAI
- Other trademarks owned by MONTRE SOLMARE S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named GRACE FABLIAU
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |