USPTO serial 76234267
MUGGER-BUGGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUGGER-BUGGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Libertyville, IL
Libertyville, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C. Litman
RICHARD C LITMAN CRYSTAL CITY STATIONLITMAN LAW OFFICE LTDP O BOX 15035ARLINGTON, VA 22215-0035Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC DISTRESS APPARATUS USED TO SET OFF A VISUALLY AND AUDIBLY DETECTABLE ALARM WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL IS IN DISTRESS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |