USPTO serial 76234444
HOTSPRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOTSPRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-72555 Metzingen, DE
D-72555 Metzingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald D. Evenson
DONALD D EVENSON CROWELL & MORING, LLPPO BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Nozzle systems for spraying heated oil onto roll edges of rolling mills, consisting of nozzles, namely power-operated spray nozzles, tanks, namely metal reservoir tanks, pumps, namely centrifugal pumps, valves, namely piston-controlled solenoid valves, and pipes, namely stainless steel air hose pipes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |